Research in Social Sciences and Technology is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal. The journal is published twice a year (May & November) in online versions. The journal accepts article submissions online through the website of the journal which can be reached at www. ressat.org The main purpose of the journal is to publish scholarly work in the social sciences, technology and their impact on education.

The scopes of the journal include: Anthropology; Archaeology; Criminology; Education; Economics; Geography; History; Information and Communications Technology (ICT); Law; Linguistics; Religion; Political science; Psychology; Sociology 

Focus and Scope

Information For Authors

Interested in submitting to this journal? We recommend that you review the About the Journal page for the journal's section policies, as well as the Author Guidelines. Authors need to register with the journal prior to submitting, or if already registered can simply log in and begin the 5 step process.

Abstracted/Indexed

Research in Social Sciences and Technology (RESSAT) E-ISSN: 2468-6891 is included to the several Abstracting/indexing such as,

Acedemic Resource Index (ResearchBib),

BASE SEARCH

Harvard Library

ERIH PLUS

AcademicKeys.com

J-GATE

i-scholar

CORE,

Academic Publishing House Researcher

Journal Seek

JournalRate

Standard Periodical Directory (Mediafinder)

Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek(EZB)

AiritiLibrary

MIAR

Index Islamicus

ROAD

The journal is under evaluation of several indexes like, ERIC, DOAJ, ProQuest, ERA, EBSCOHOST, SCOPUS etc..

Peer Review Process

Authors are requested to submit their papers electronically by using the online manuscript submission 
gateway at: http://www.ressat.org

This site will guide authors stepwise through the submission process. Authors, reviewers, and editors send and receive all correspondence by e-mail and no paper correspondence is necessary. Should you be unable to provide an electronic version, please contact the Editor prior to submission at: btarman@ressat.org The Editor of RESSAT regret that they are not able to consider submissions that do not follow these procedures.

All submitted articles should report original, previously unpublished research results, experimental or theoretical, and will be peer-reviewed. Articles submitted to the journal should meet these criteria and must not be under consideration for publication elsewhere. Manuscripts should follow the style of the journal and are subject to both review and editing.

Conflict of Interest

Authors hold the full responsibility for submitted manuscripts to Research in Social Sciences and Technology (RESSAT)  If there is a conflict of interest with other person(s), organization(s), or institution(s), this should be stated before evaluation process is started. 

Submission Declaration

Manuscripts submitted to RESSAT must be original and have not been fully or partly published before. All submissions may go through plagiarism/uniformity control process in multiple software. It should be noted that uniformity with the author(s) previous work is also considered plagiarism. Submissions with plagiarist acts are rejected and are not accepted again. 

Copyright

Author(s) must accept that the content, the findings, and the conclusions of the submitted manuscripts does not bind the Owner, the Editor, Editorial Board Members, or Scientific Committee Members of RESSAT.

Author(s) must declare that the submitted manuscripts to RESSAT are original and have not been published previously or are under consideration of publication elsewhere. 

Author(s) must confirm that RESSAT retains all the copyrights unconditionally and indefinitely to distribute the articles published by RESSAT due course of Intellectual Property Law, Article 22, Act 5846; to share publicly due course of Article 23; and to hold full rights of communication related to the published article anytime, anywhere and via any means due course of Article 25 of Intellectual Property Law.

Global or Self Plagiarism

Authors cannot use other researchers’ opinions or thoughts as their own. Similarly, authors cannot use thoughts, opinions, and parts of research from their own previous work without citing properly.

Publication Frequency

RESSAT publish two regular issues a year which is scheduled for November and May in addition to the special issues which may be various number for each year.

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Competing interest policy

RESSAT has a transparent publications policy, requiring authors to declare any relevant competing interests of a personal, professional or financial nature at the time of submission. All authors should disclose any financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence or bias their work.

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

Our publication ethics and publication malpractice statement is mainly based on the Code of Conduct
and Best-Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors (Committee on Publication Ethics, 2011).
Editors' responsibilities
Publication decisions
The editor is responsible for deciding which of the papers submitted to the journal will be published.
The editor will evaluate manuscripts without regard to the authors' race, gender, sexual orientation,
religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy. The decision will be based on the
paper’s importance, originality and clarity, and the study’s validity and its relevance to the journal's
scope. Current legal requirements regarding libel, copyright infringement, and plagiarism should also
be considered.
Confidentiality
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to
anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers,
and the publisher, as appropriate.
Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted paper will not be used by the editor or the members
of the editorial board for their own research purposes without the author's explicit written consent.
Reviewers' responsibilities
Contribution to editorial decisions
The peer-reviewing process assists the editor and the editorial board in making editorial decisions
and may also serve the author in improving the paper.
Promptness
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows
that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and withdraw from the review
process.
Confidentiality
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be
disclosed to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
Standards of objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees
should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of sources
Reviewers should identify cases in which relevant published work referred to in the paper has not
been cited in the reference section. They should point out whether observations or arguments
derived from other publications are accompanied by the respective source. Reviewers will notify the
editor of any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any
other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
Disclosure and conflict of interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used
for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of
interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of
the authors, companies, or institutions associated with the papers.
Authors' duties
Reporting standards
Authors of original research reports should present an accurate account of the work performed as
well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately
in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the
work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are
unacceptable.
Data access and retention
Authors could be asked to provide the raw data of their study together with the paper for editorial
review and should be prepared to make the data publicly available if practicable. In any event,
authors should ensure accessibility of such data to other competent professionals for at least ten
years after publication (preferably via an institutional or subject-based data repository or other data
center), provided that the confidentiality of the participants can be protected and legal rights
concerning proprietary data do not preclude their release.
Originality, plagiarism and acknowledgement of sources
Authors will submit only entirely original works, and will appropriately cite or quote the work and/or
words of others. Publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported
work should also be cited.
Multiple, redundant or concurrent publication
In general, papers describing essentially the same research should not be published in more than one
journal. Submitting the same paper to more than one journal constitutes unethical publishing
behavior and is unacceptable.
Manuscripts which have been published as copyrighted material elsewhere cannot be submitted. In
addition, manuscripts under review by the journal should not be resubmitted to copyrighted
publications. However, by submitting a manuscript, the author(s) retain the rights to the published
material. In case of publication they permit the use of their work under a CC-BY license
[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/], which allows others to copy, distribute and transmit
the work as well as to adapt the work and to make commercial use of it.

Authorship of the paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception,
design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant
contributions should be listed as co-authors.
The corresponding author ensures that all contributing co-authors and no uninvolved persons are
included in the author list. The corresponding author will also verify that all co-authors have
approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
Disclosure and conflicts of interest
All authors should include a statement disclosing any financial or other substantive conflicts of
interest that may be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All
sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the
author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and to cooperate with the
editor to retract or correct the paper in form of an erratum.
References
Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). (2011, March 7). Code of Conduct and Best-Practice
Guidelines for Journal Editors. Retrieved from
http://publicationethics.org/files/Code_of_conduct_for_journal_editors_Mar11.pdf