Clinical Entrepreneurship: A Student Teacher Assigning Desktop Documentary Making

Supplementary Files

Title Page


student teaching
teacher education
desktop documentary making
history education

How to Cite

Schul, J. (2017). Clinical Entrepreneurship: A Student Teacher Assigning Desktop Documentary Making. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 2(2). Retrieved from


This study examines a student teacher’s assignment of a historical documentary project in her middle school classroom placement. Results reveal that this student teacher and her cooperating teacher collaborated together to assign the project as a means to foster a personal connection with students and that their mutual commitment to this purpose fostered an experimentalist type of student teaching experience.  Despite experiencing adversity with assigning the documentary project, the student teacher was not deterred from completing the project nor from her desire to assign a documentary making project in the future.  Implications of these findings are discussed.


Barton, K. C., & Levstik, L. S. (2003). Why don't history teachers engage students in interpretation? Social Education, 67, 358-361.

Barton, K. C. & Levstik, L. S. (2004). Teaching history for the common good. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Bogdan, R.C. & Biklen, S. K. (2003). Qualitative research for education. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to development research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.

Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, and R. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on Activity Theory (pp. 19-38). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119-161). Washington, D.C.: American Educational Research Association.

Fairbanks, C. M., Freedman, D., & Kahn, C. (2000). The role of effective mentors in learning to teach. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(2), 102-112.

Fehn, B. & Schul, J. (2014) Selective Appropriation and Historical Documentary Making in a Special Education Classroom. Social Studies Research & Practice, 9(2).

Grant, S.G. (2003). History lessons. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Grant, S.G. (2005). More journey than end. In E.A. Yeager & Jr. Davis, O.L. (Eds.), Wise social studies teaching in an age of high-stakes testing (pp. 117-130). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

Grant, S.G. & Gradwell, J.M. (Eds.). (2010) Teaching history with big ideas: Cases of ambitious teachers. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Education.

Kaptelinin, V. & Nardi, B.A. (2006). Acting with technology: Activity theory and interaction design. Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.

Knoblauch, D., & Hoy, A. W. (2008). “Maybe I can teach those kids.†The influence of contextual factors on student teachers’ efficacy beliefs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 166-179.

Kozulin, A. (1998). Psychological tools: A sociocultural approach to education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Kozulin, A. & Presseisen, B. (1995). Mediated learning experience and psychological tools: Vygotsky’s and Feuerstein’s perspectives in a study of student learning. Educational Psychologist, 30(2), 67-75. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3002_3

LeCompte, M.D., & Schensul, J.J. (1999). Analyzing & interpreting ethnographic data. Walnut Creek, CA; AltaMira.

Leont’ev, A.N. (1974). The problem of activity in psychology. Soviet Psychology, 13(2),


Leont’ev, A.N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

Lofland, J., & Lofland, L.H. (1995). Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

McNay, M., & Graham, R. (2007). Can cooperating teachers help student teachers develop a vision of education? The Teacher Educator, 42(3), 224-236.

Molebash, P.E. (2004). Preservice teacher perceptions of a technology-enriched methods course. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Social Studies Teacher Education, 3(4), 412-432.

Roth, W. (2004). Activity theory and education: An introduction. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 11(1), 1-8. doi:10.1207/s15327884mca1101_1

Roth, W. & Lee, Y. (2007). “Vygotsky’s neglected legacyâ€: Cultural-historical activity theory. Review of Educational Research, 77(2), pp. 186-232.

Rosenzweig, R. (with Bass, R.) (2011). Rewiring the history and social studies classroom: Needs, frameworks, dangers and proposals. In Roy Rosenzweig, Clio wired: The future of the past in the digital age. I (pp. 92-109). New York: Columbia University Press.

Schul, J. E. (2010a). Necessity is the mother of invention: An experienced history teacher’s integration of desktop documentary making. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 6(1), 14-32. Retrieved from

Schul, J. E. (2010b). The mergence of CHAT with TPCK: A new framework for researching the

integration of desktop documentary making in history teaching and learning. THEN: Technology, Humanities, Education & Narrative, 7, 9-25.

Schul, J. (2012a) Compositional Encounters: Evolvement of Secondary Students’ Narratives while Making Historical Documentaries. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 36(3), 219-244.

Schul, J.E. (2012b). Toward a Community of Learners: An Experienced Teacher’s Integration of Desktop Documentary Making in a General Secondary History Classroom. The International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 8(1), 44-62. Retrieved from

Schul, J. (2014) Emotional Evocation and Desktop Documentary Making: Secondary Students’ Motivations while Composing Historical Documentaries (pp. 439-466). In Russell, W. (Ed.) Digital Social Studies. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

Shank, G.D. (2002). Analyzing. In Qualitative research: A personal skills approach (Chapter 8, pp. 126-145). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.

Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Swan, K., Hofer, M., & Swan, G. (2011). Examining authentic intellectual work with a historical digital documentary inquiry project in a mandated state testing environment. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 27(3), 115–122.

Valencia, S. W., Martin, S. D., Place, N. A., & Grossman, P. (2009). Complex interactions in student teaching lost opportunities for learning. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(3), 304-322.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Wenglinsky, H. (2005). Using technology wisely. New York: Teachers College Press.

Wertsch, J.V. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.

Wertsch, J. V. & Tulviste, P. (1992). L.S. Vygotsky and contemporary developmental psychology. Developmental Psychology, 28(4), pp. 1-10. doi:10.1037//0012-1649.28.4.548

Yamagata-Lynch, L.C. (2007). Confronting analytical dilemmas for understanding complex human interactions in design-based research from a cultural-historical activity theory (CHAT) framework. The Journal of the Learning

Sciences, 16(4), 451-484.

Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage publications.