Pre-Service Teachers' Attitude on ELT Research
PDF

Keywords

Attitude
Pre-service Teachers
ELT Reseach
Research Performance
EFL Teaching

How to Cite

Kustati, M., & Al-Azmi, H. (2018). Pre-Service Teachers’ Attitude on ELT Research. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 3(2), 1-13. Retrieved from http://ressat.org/index.php/ressat/article/view/47

Abstract

This paper reports on a research determining the attitudes of pre-service EFL teachers’ attitude to research in English language teaching (ELT) in Indonesia. A mixed method was used in this study. A survey questionnaire was completed by 217 (F= 187, M=30) participants who enrolled in the fourth year of undergraduate teacher education. Then, interview was used to identify their problems in conducting the research. The participants acknowledged that they had positive attitudes towards research in ELT. Meanwhile, they had negative views about English department involvement in their research. While there were no significant sex differences in the attitudes to ELT research. The interview findings revealed that there were some factors that made them get difficulties in doing their research. The pedagogical implications of the study for the pre-service teachers include the need to be aware of the significant relationship between attitude and background in research practice and they should be trained formally on conducting  and writing ELT research.
PDF

References

Alexander, B. B., Foertsch, J., & Daffinrud, S. (1998). The Spend a Summer with a Scientist Program: An evaluation of program outcomes and the essential elements for success. Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison. Spend a Summer with a Scientist.

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C. K., & Walker, D. (2013). Introduction to research in education. Cengage Learning.

Babbie, E. 2001. The Practice of Social Research. 9th ed. Belmont: Wadsworth/ Thompson Learning.

Barlow, G.A., Burbank M. D., Kauchak D., and Stevens T. (1999). Pre-service teachers’ thinking on research: implications for inquiry oriented teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15, 7, 753-770.

Bolton, J. 1999. AECC students’ perceptions of, and attitude to, chiropractic research and research related activities, in Proceedings of the FCU Research Convention. Odense, Demark.

Crookes, G & Chandler, P. 1999. Introducing action research into teacher education. Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Pearson College Division.

Dawson, Catherine, 2002, Practical Research Methods. New Delhi, UBS Publishers’ Distributors.

Fasold, R. 1984. The Sociolinguistics of Society. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

de los Angeles Clemente, M. (2001). Teachers attitudes within a self-directed language learning scheme. System, 29(1), 45–67.

Di Pietro, R. J. (1986). The Sociolinguistics of Society. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 174(3), 180–181.

Dörnyei, Z., & Csizér, K. (2002). Some dynamics of language attitudes and motivation: Results of a longitudinal nationwide survey. Applied Linguistics, 23(4), 421–462.

Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2008). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. McGraw-Hill Higher Education.

Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. W. (2006). Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Applications. Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.

Hathaway, R. S., Nagda, B. A., & Gregerman, S. R. (2002). The relationship of undergraduate research participation to graduate and professional education pursuit: an empirical study. Journal of College Student Development, 43(5) 614-31.

Holmes, J. 1994. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. London: Longman Group.

Johnson, R.B. & Onwuegbuzie, A.J. 2004. Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher 33 (7): 14-26.

Meredith D, Gall Joyce P. Gall Water R., and Borg. 2003. Educational Research: an Introduction. Pearson Education, Inc

Kardash, C. M. (2000). Evaluation of an undergraduate research experience: perceptions of undergraduate interns and their faculty mentors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1) 191-201.

Karn, S.J. 2007. Current trends in ELT around the Globe. Journal of NELTA. 12 (1 &2): 66-66.

Kumar, Ranjit, 2005, Research Methodology-A Step-by-Step Guide for Beginners, (2nd .ed), Singapore, Pearson Education.

Kwary, D. A., Chasanah, I. N., & Sudijah, D. (2005). Pengembangan kecerdasan emosi (eq) anak melalui kisah-kisah dalam seri cerita balita.

Lopatto, D. (2006). Undergraduate research as a catalyst for liberal learning. Peer Review, 8(1) 22-25.

McNiff, J., with Whitehead, J., (2002), Research: Principles and Practice, Routledge, London and New York.

Moore, N. (2004). Research Perspectives on English for Academic Purposes. English for Specific Purposes 23, 1, 96-100.

Nagda, B. A., Gregerman, R. S., Jonides, J., Von Hippel, W., & Lerner, J. S. (1998). Undergraduate student-faculty research partnerships affect student retention. The Review of Higher Education, 22(1) 55-72.

Newell, D., & Cunliffe, C. (2003). Attitudes toward research in undergraduate chiropractic students. Clinical Chiropractic, 6(3), 109–119.

Savignon, S. J., & Wang, C. (2003). Communicative language teaching in EFL contexts: Learner attitudes and perceptions. IRAL, 41(3), 223–250.

Seymour, E., Barrie-Hunter, A., Laursen, S. L., & Deantoni, T. (2004). Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: first findings from a three-year study. Science Education, 88(4) 493-534.

Suhardi, S. 1991. Sikap bahasa. Depok: Fakultas sastra Universitas Indonesia.

Tercanlioglu, L. (2005). Pre-service EFL teachers’ beliefs about foreign language learning and how they relate to gender. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 3(1), 145–162.

Torcanlioglu, L. (2011). Pre-service EFL attitudes towards research.